Interference No. 104,699
Spalding v. Hartsell
as automatically reinstated, as is, without extension.
Based on the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1 is herein entered against
junior party ROBERT G. SPALDING;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 2 is herein
entered against junior party ROBERT G. SPALDING;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party ROBERT G. SPALDING is not entitled to its
patent claims 1-6 which correspond to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party ROBERT G. SPALDING is not entitled to its
patent claims 7-8 which correspond to Count 2;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be filed in the respective involved
application or patent of the parties.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007