Interference No. 104,703
Page No. 20
1. Suwa’s Claim Correspondence
Suwa Preliminary Motion 1 proposes the following claim correspondence for Suwa’s
claims:
Count A (“AD”): 2-4, 16, 17 and 19-22
Count B (“ROMP”): 2-17, 19-20 and 24-41
Count C (“MA”): 23
(Paper No. 31, pages 13-14). Goodall has argued in support of Suwa’s proposed claim
correspondence. (Goodall Response 1, Paper No. 39, ¶¶6-8). As we are not aware of any error
in Suwa’s proposed claim correspondence for Suwa’s claims, we adopt Suwa’s proposed claim
correspondence for Suwa’s claims.
2. Goodall Claim Correspondence
Suwa Preliminary Motion 1 proposes the following claim correspondence for the claims
of Goodall’s ‘499 patent:
Count A (“AD”): 1, 3 and 12
Count B (“ROMP”): 6
(Paper No. 31, p. 16). Further, Suwa states that claims 2, 4, 5 and 7-11 of Goodall ‘499 do not
correspond to any proposed count. (Paper No. 31, p. 16). Goodall concurs. (Paper No. 39,
pages 9-12).
Goodall has requested the addition of the ‘218 application to the interference. Further,
Goodall has proposed the following claim correspondence for the claim of the ‘218 application:
Count C (“MA”): 47
(Goodall Preliminary Motion 1, Paper No. 29, p. 1).
Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007