Interference No. 104,708
Cheslock v. Beerwerth
CANFIELD, and RICHARD K. HARRIS is not entitled to its claims 1-4 and 8-21 of involved
Patent No. 5,833,367, which correspond to Count 1 ;
that junior party EDWARD P. CHESLOCK, ERIC L.
CANFIELD, and RICHARD K. HARRIS is not entitled to its claim 22 of involved Patent No.
5,833,367, its claims 1, 3-8, and 10-14 of involved Patent No. 6,030,117, and its claims 1-7 of
involved Patent No. 6,042,266, which correspond to Count 3;
that senior party FRANK BEERWERTH, BERNHARD
KRAUS, and KATJA HONNEFELLER is not entitled to its application claims 23, 24, and 25, in
accordance with the decision on preliminary motions (Paper No. 94);
that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and
that a copy of this judgment be filed in the respective involved
application or patent of the parties.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007