The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 55 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed: November 25, 2002 Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ EARL A. E. LUND, ROBERT C. PARKER, IAN R. SHANKLAND, Junior Party, (Patents 5,672,294 and 5,677,358) v. BARBARA H. MINOR Senior Party (Application 08/609,183). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,749 _______________ Before: SCHAFER, TIERNEY and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge. FINAL JUDGMENT This interference involves a single count, Count 1. Minor has two pending claims that correspond to Count 1, i.e., claims 17 and 18. (Notice Declaring Interference, Paper No. 1, p. 6). Minor has requested entry of adverse judgment as to all of Minor’s claims that correspond to the count. (Minor Request for Adverse Judgment, Paper No. 54). As Minor has conceded priority as to all of Minor’s corresponding claims, Minor has effectively abandoned the contest as to CountPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007