THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion (1) was not written for publication and (2) is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper 100
Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-979778
Fax: 703-305-0942
JOSEPH C. BURRISS, ROBERT T. CIMINI,
CHRIS L. HEIKKINEN, DAVID A. JUSTMANN,
RICHARD F. KELLER, DONALD L. SMITH and DAVID J. VanEPEREN
Junior Party,
(Application 09/326,277),
v.
KUI-CHIU KWOK
Senior Party,
(Patent 6,077,375).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 104,782
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge
Senior party Kwok has filed a paper (Paper 100) abandoning “the above-identified
interference contest, and agrees to entry of adverse judgment agains Kwok.” Accordingly , it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Counts 1 and 2 (Paper 1,
p.5), is awarded against the senior party KUI-CHIU KWOK;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party, KUI-CHIU KWOK, is not entitled to a patent
containing claims 1-7, 10, 14-16, 20, 24 (corresponding to Count 1) or claims 8, 9, 11-13, 17-19, 21-
23 (corresponding to Count 2) of Patent 6,077,375;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be made of record in Application
09/326,277 and in the file of Patent 6,077,375; and
Page: 1 2 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007