The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 15
Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel
Box Interference Filed: October 17, 2002
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
SUSAN MARY DALUGE, MICHELLE JOANNE FUGETT
AND MICHAEL TOLAR MARTIN
Junior Party
(U.S. Patent Application 09/419,416),
v.
GERHARD STUCKY, RENÉ IMWINKELRIED
Senior Party,
(U.S. Patent No. 5,663,340).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 105,015 (MPT)
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, TIERNEY and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINAL JUDGMENT
Senior Party Stucky has abandoned the contest as to Count 1, the sole count in the
interference. Further, Stucky agrees to entry of adverse judgment as to Count 1 and Stucky claim
1, which corresponds to Count 1. (Paper No. 14). Upon consideration of the record, it is:
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Notice Declaring Interference,
Paper No. 1, page 5), the sole count in the interference, is awarded against Senior Party Stucky.
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007