Ex Parte CROWLEY et al - Page 1


               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
                    today was not written for publication and is                      
                         not binding precedent of the Board                           
                                                       Paper No. 18                   
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                             Ex parte ROBERT J. CROWLEY                               
                                and DONALD N. HALFREN                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                   Appeal No. 2000-1518                               
                              Application 08/604,105                                  
                                   _______________                                    
                                 ON BRIEF                                             
                                   _______________                                    
          Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     

                              ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                
               In a paper filed on November 8, 2002, appellants request               
          that we reconsider our decision dated September 19, 2002, wherein           
          we reversed the examiner's rejection of the claims on appeal                











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007