The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WALTER H. ISAAC, JAMES S. HONAN and EDGAR E. RIECKE ____________ Appeal No. 1998-2305 Application No. 08/670,466 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KIMLIN, DELMENDO, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING This is in response to Appellants’ letter, filed May 31, 2002, responding to our decision, mailed March 22, 2002.1 In our previous decision, we affirmed the rejection of claims 1, 3 and 5 to 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Takeuchi and reversed the rejection of 1 We will treat Appellants’ letter as a Requests for reconsideration under 37 CFR § 1.197(b). In addition to the letter, Appellants presented two declarations under 35 U.S.C. § 1.132.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007