The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte LAVAUGHN F. WATTS JR, ____________ Appeal No. 1999-2052 Application No. 08/572,202 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before SMITH, LALL, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. LALL, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING Appellant requests that we reconsider our decision of May 6, 2002, wherein we sustained, under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the rejection of claims 1, 4-9, 16, 17, 39, 41-43, 45-47, 49-51, 53, 54, 63, 64 and 66 over Smith and Kikinis; the rejection of claims 21-27, 55, 56, 58-60, 62, 67 and 70-74 over Smith, Kikinis and Kenny; and of claims 28 and 29 over Smith, Kikinis and Gephardt; however, we did not sustain the rejection of claims 3, 10, 18 and 30-38 over Smith and Kikinis.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007