The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RONALD K. KERSCHNER
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0930
Application No. 08/888,339
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRETT, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is a decision on the Request for Rehearing, filed Aug. 15, 2002, from our
decision affirming-in-part the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-28 under 35 U.S.C.
§§ 102 and 103.
We have carefully considered appellant’s arguments in the request, however, we
are not persuaded that our decision on the record before us was in error. Appellant
argues at page 7 of the Request for Rehearing that the conclusion paragraph does not
agree with the text of the decision. We agree with appellant that the conclusion
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007