Appeal No. 1999-2687
Application 08/174,353
We have carefully considered the arguments raised by
appellants in their request for rehearing, but none of these
arguments are persuasive that the original decision was in error.
We are still of the view that the invention set forth in claims
1, 3-6, 8-12, 14-16, 21, 23-28, 31, 33-35 and 37-40 is not
patentable over the applied prior art based on the record
presented to us in the original appeal.
We have granted appellants’ request to the extent that we
have reconsidered our decision of January 14, 2002, but we deny
the request with respect to making any changes therein.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007