Ex Parte GOODWIN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-0229                                                        
          Application No. 08/603,005                                 Page 2           


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellant's invention relates to an auxiliary display                  
          recognition system and method for an electronic price label                 
          system.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a            
          reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows:               
               1.  A system for utilizing a plurality of auxiliary displays           
          of different types with each of the auxiliary displays of each              
          type having a type designation, recognizing the type of an                  
          auxiliary display attached to an electronic price label, and                
          helping to ensure that the correct type of auxiliary display is             
          attached to the electronic price label comprising:                          
               a number of auxiliary display recorders which sense a number           
          of indicators on the auxiliary display;                                     
               wherein the indicators are arranged in a predetermined                 
          pattern which uniquely identifies the type designation for the              
          auxiliary display; and                                                      
               circuit means coupled to the auxiliary display recorders for           
          determining the type designation of the auxiliary display from              
          the pattern.                                                                

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Hellsberg                4,602,151           Jul. 22, 1986                  
          Poland                   5,401,947           Mar. 28, 1995                  
          Ahlm                     WO 94/23381         Oct. 13, 1994                  
          Claims 1, 2, and 5-17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as            
          being unpatentable over Ahlm in view of Poland.                             









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007