Appeal No. 2000-0427
Application No. 08/773,173
sustain the obviousness rejection of claims 18 and 27-29 over
Dockery in view of the admitted prior art and Emmons.
In summary, we have sustained under 35 U.S.C. § 103 the
rejection of claims 1, 7, 10, 18, 27-35, and 40-45, while we have
not sustained the rejection of claims 5, 16, and 39.
Accordingly, the decision of the examiner under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Parshotam S. Lall )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Joseph L. Dixon ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Lance Leonard Barry )
Administrative Patent Judge )
PSL:tdl
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007