Ex Parte GABBER et al - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                                                                                           Paper No. 21                 

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                    __________                                                          

                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                         _____                                                          
                                                     __________                                                         
                            Ex parte ERAN GABBER, and ABRAHAM SILBERSCHATZ                                              
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 2000-1999                                                    
                                                Application 08/748,314                                                  
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                     __________                                                         
              Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges,                                 
              KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       


                     This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-44.                              
                     The invention pertains to a protocol for secure communication of electronic                        
              commercial transactions.                                                                                  

                     The nature of the invention is easily understood from reference to representative                  
              independent claim 1 reproduced as follows:                                                                
                     1.     A protocol for securely communicating a financial transaction between a                     
                     customer and a merchant, a central authority having a central authority private                    
                                                           1                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007