Appeal No. 2000-2012
Application No. 08/937,354
With respect to dependent claims 24-29, appellants rely on prior arguments
generally at page 18 of the brief. Since we found appellants' prior arguments
unpersuasive with the exception of the determining step and the structure of the
structure of the database, we do not find appellants’ general argument persuasive, and
we will sustain the rejection of claims 24-29.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-4, 20, 21 and 30 under
35 U.S.C. § 102 is affirmed and the decision of the examiner to reject claims 14-19, 22, 23
and 31 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is reversed; the decision of the examiner to reject claims
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007