The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 32 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KYEONG-TAEG YANG ____________ Appeal No. 2000-2291 Application No. 08/777,7211 ____________ HEARD: NOVEMBER 21, 2002 ____________ Before LALL, GROSS, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claim 1. Claims 6-20 have been allowed. The Examiner has objected to claims 2-5 and has indicated their allowability if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. We reverse. 1 Application for patent filed December 20, 1996, which claims the foreign filing priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of Korean Application 1995-53538, filed December 21, 1995.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007