Appeal No. 2000-2293 Application No. 08/685,162 See also In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071, 1074, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988). Based on these well-settled principles, we disagree with the Examiner that, because Kawamura’s holding hooks 20 elastically fit around a naked disc or on holding notches of a disc cartridge, the hooks constitute the break-away mechanism for preventing damage to the disc holding tray. The Examiner’s position is that the elastic holding hooks of Kawamura form a break away mechanism that is inherently adapted for preventing damage to the disc holding tray and may be combined with the rotating hinge of Sasaki. Although Sasaki discloses a tilting disc holding tray, the Examiner has failed to establish why one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to use the holding hooks of Kawamura with the disk table of Sasaki. Even if the Examiner is contending that holding hooks 20 of Kawamura prevent damage to the inserted disc or the cartridge, such protection is available only when the disc or the cartridge is inserted in the housing. The holding hooks, at best, prevent damage to the tray from its own lateral movement, but not from external force when the disc supporting portion of the tray is extended from the housing. Kawamura, in fact, merely discloses a mechanism having elastic hooks for receiving a disc or a 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007