The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MICHAEL D. PERRY
and
BRENT C. STUART
__________
Appeal No. 2001-0238
Application No. 08/859,020
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JEFFREY T. SMITH, PAWLIKOWSKI and MOORE, Administrative
Patent Judges.
MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1 - 11, which are all of the claims pending
in this application.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAIMS
Claims 1, 2, 10 and 11 are representative of the claimed
subject matter and read as follow:
1. A method for machining metals and alloys, comprising:
producing a pulsed laser output beam from a solid state
laser, wherein said pulsed output beam comprises a plurality of
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007