Ex Parte JALETT et al - Page 28




          Appeal No. 2001-0421                                                        
          Application 08/926,835                                                      


          of reaction conditions including pressure, temperature,                     
          concentration and molar ratio.  Nevertheless, the majority holds            
          that the appealed claims are indefinite under the second                    
          paragraph of section 112.  The majority has given one and only              
          one reasonably specific basis for this holding which is the fact            
          that the claims do not actively and positively recite the steps             
          which result in a reaction mixture containing the recited                   
          ingredients including the acid ingredient in particular5.  As               


               5 At this point, it is necessary to express a caveat.  As              
          support for their section 112 position, the majority panel                  
          members have focused on the fact that the appealed claims do not            
          actively and positively recite the steps which result in a                  
          reaction mixture which “additionally contains an acid.”                     
          Independent claims 1 and 36.  Nevertheless, the language of the             
          majority opinion is such that other aspects of the appealed                 
          claims may well be considered by the majority panel members to              
          raise indefiniteness issues.  For example, at no less than 3                
          different locations in their opinion, the majority panel members            
          indicate that the independent claim phrase “the reaction mixture”           
          lacks antecedent basis.  Slip Op., at pages 6, 7 and 9.  If the             
          majority believes this phrase offends the second paragraph of               
          section 112, they are in error as no one with ordinary skill in             
          this art would consider the phrase to be indefinite.  As an                 
          additional example, the majority expressly states that “[t]he               
          claims should actively recite the steps of adding each of the               
          individual components of the reaction mixture.”  Slip Op., at               
          pages 8-9; emphasis supplied.  Thus, although the majority                  
          opinion focuses on the acid ingredient specifically, this express           
          statement reflects that the majority panel members will maintain            
          their indefiniteness position unless the appealed claims are                
          amended to actively recite the steps of adding each and every one           
          of the individual ingredients of the here claimed reaction                  
          mixture.                                                                    
                                         28                                           





Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007