The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte JENNIFER L. RANDALL _____________ Appeal No. 2001-0516 Application No. 08/834,073 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before KRASS, RUGGIERO, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-17 and 19, which are all of the claims pending in the present application. Claim 18 has been canceled. The claimed invention relates to a surveillance system and a method for selective area motion detection. A motion detector is provided for detecting motion within a selected field of view of a video camera, the motion detector including a mask for masking from motion detection selected portions of the video camera’s field of view. More particularly, a target mask image from amongPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007