The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DIDIER DANIEL CLAUDE BARDON, RICHARD EDMOND BERRY,
SCOTT HARLAN ISENSEE, SHIRLEY LYNN MARTIN,
and JOHN MARTIN MULLALY
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0522
Application No. 08/887,830
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before DIXON, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-15, and 17-21, which are all the claims remaining in the
application.
We reverse.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007