Appeal No. 2001-0653 Application 08/820,736 failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the claims of Group 5. The rejection of claims 11, 12, 18, 19, 27, 28, 31, and 38 is reversed. CONCLUSION The rejection of claim 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, is reversed. The rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 20-22, 32-34, and 40 under § 103(a) is sustained. The rejection of claims 5-19, 23-31, and 35-39 under § 103(a) is reversed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED-IN-PART JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) )) BOARD OF PATENT LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) MAHSHID D. SAADAT ) - 26 -Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007