Appeal No. 2001-0677 Application No. 08/974,575 selection via a pull down menu and that adding a print button onto the display of a Web page would not have been necessary or motivated. (See brief at page 8. ) We agree with appellant. Appellant argues that the skilled artisan would not have been motivated to add printing to the real time collaborative environment as taught by Cuomo. (See brief at page 8.) We agree with appellant. From our review of Cuomo, Cuomo teaches that one of the objects of Cuomo’s invention is to use proxies and shared state servers to enable collaboration within existing Web browsers. Additionally, Cuomo teaches that the Proxy 202 contains Forwarding Software 204 that requests Web pages, forwards them to the appropriate Web Server 206 and manipulates the retrieved data before delivering it to the Web Browser 205. (Cuomo at col. 3.) Cuomo uses an Applet 207 embedded by the Forwarding Software 204 and the Applet receives commands from the collaboration session and provides that information to the Client Software 203 that the Client Software can disseminate to the collaboration session. (Cuomo at col. 4.) From the teachings of Cuomo, we find no teaching or suggestion to modify a Web page and insert a print button. Appellant argues that Harkins teaches a similar use of a print functionality, but from a “network services” icon on the display interface and that it would not have been 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007