The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID P. BAUER and DUANE C. NEWMAN ____________ Appeal No. 2001-0882 Application No. 08/950,965 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRATZ, PAWLIKOWSKI and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2 and 8-17. Claims 18-30, which are all of the other claims that remain pending in this application, stand withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner as drawn to a non-elected invention. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention relates to a system for consolidating powders. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007