The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DOUGLAS SHANDER,
GURPREET S. AHLUWALIA, and
DIANA MARKS-DEL GROSSO
___________
Appeal No. 2001-0914
Application No. 08/869,381
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of
claims 1 through 4, 11, and 22 through 41, all the claims pending in the application.
Claim 1, the only independent claim pending, is representative of the subject matter on
appeal and reads as follows:
1. A process of reducing the rate of mammalian hair growth, comprising
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007