Ex Parte ACHARYA - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-0924                                                        
          Application No. 08/885,415                                                  


               Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                            
               1.   An image compression apparatus comprising:                        
                    a first look-up table configured to provide a                     
               quantized code upon being indexed by a single address;                 
                    a second look-up table configured to provide the                  
               length of said code upon being indexed by said single                  
               address; and                                                           
                    a predictive coding circuit coupled to said first                 
               look-up table and to said second look-up table, said                   
               predictive coding circuit generating said single                       
               address;                                                               
                    a difference circuit, said difference circuit                     
               configured to generate said single address by                          
               difference said input pixel value and a predicted pixel                
               value; and                                                             
                    a third look-up table coupled to said difference                  
               circuit, said third look-up indexed by said single                     
               address to provide an inverse quantized code to said                   
               predictive coding circuit.                                             
               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                
          Gonzales et al. (Gonzales)    4,725,885      Feb. 16, 1988                  
          Barrett                       5,341,442      Aug. 23, 1994                  
               Claims 1, 2, 5, 6 and 9 through 13 stand rejected under                
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Barrett alone.  As to                 
          claims 7 and 8, the examiner rejects these claims on the basis of           
          Barrett in view of Gonzales.                                                




                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007