Ex Parte KIM et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1002                                                        
          Application No. 08/709,963                                                  


          percent by weight of the composition.  This appealed subject                
          matter is adequately represented by independent claim 17 which              
          reads as follows:                                                           
                    17.  A browning composition in the form of an emulsion            
               comprising a thickening agent, and a caramel-colored                   
               colorant, wherein the caramel-colored colorant and                     
               thickening agent are present at a weight ratio of between              
               5:100 and 100:100, and the amount of thickening agent is at            
               least 2.5 percent by weight of the composition.                        
               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of              
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Anderson et al. (Anderson)      5,139,800           Aug. 18, 1992           
          Hsu et al. (Hsu)                5,196,219           Mar. 23, 1993           
          Owen, Food Chemistry, pp. 630-31 (New York, Marcel Dekker, Inc.,            
          1985) (hereinafter referred to as the Food Chemistry reference).            
               Claims 4 and 21-23 are rejected under the first paragraph of           
          35 U.S.C. § 112 as containing subject matter which was not                  
          described in the originally filed specification in such a way as            
          to reasonably convey to one skilled in the art that the inventors           
          had possession of the now claimed invention at the time the                 
          application was filed.                                                      
               All of the claims on appeal are rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Anderson in view of Hsu and             
          the Food Chemistry reference.                                               



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007