The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TED G. LAUTZENHEISER, THOMAS K. AUSTIN,
and THOMAS R. PETERS
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1007
Application No. 08/937,025
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 7, 24,
31, 39, and 45. Claims 2-6, 8-14, 25-30, 40-44 and 46 and have been objected to by
the examiner as being allowable if rewritten in independent form. Claims 15-23 and 32-
38 have been indicated by the examiner as allowable.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007