Appeal No. 2001-1008
Application No. 08/971,097
presented a similar argument, the Court responded that there is
no precedence that holds that objective analysis, proper
authority, and reasoned findings can be omitted from Board
decisions. See In re Lee, 277 F.3d at 1344, 61 USPQ2d at 1435.
Therefore, we will not sustain the Examiner's rejection of claims
1 through 3, and 7 through 12 as being unpatentable under 35
U.S.C. § 103.
In regard to the rejection of claims 4 through 6 and 13
under 35 U.S.C. § 103, we note that the Examiner relies on the
same reason to combine Wolfe and Nishimura. Therefore, for the
same reasons as above, we will not sustain this rejection.
77
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007