Ex Parte FINCH et al - Page 1




                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for        
                                 publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       
                                                                                    Paper No. 23              

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                               ____________                                                   
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                               ____________                                                   
                         Ex parte RICHARD W. FINCH AND RODERICK W. STONE                                      
                                               ____________                                                   
                                            Appeal No. 2001-1095                                              
                                         Application No. 08/622,806                                           
                                               ____________                                                   
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                               ____________                                                   
            Before KRASS, DIXON, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
            DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-26,           
            which are all the claims pending in this appeal.                                                  


                   We REVERSE.                                                                                












Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007