Ex Parte TESHIMA et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                                                 Paper No. 24                 
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                __________                                                    
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                    
                               Ex parte HAYATO TESHIMA and TAKAAKI ITOH                                       
                                                __________                                                    
                                            Appeal No. 2001-1160                                              
                                          Application No. 08/479,977                                          
                                                __________                                                    
                                            HEARD June 10, 2003                                               
                                                __________                                                    
                Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SCHEINER, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent                          
                Judges.                                                                                       
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                  
                final rejection of claims 6 and 8-16, all of the claims remaining.  Claim 6 is                
                representative and reads as follows:                                                          
                      6.     A method for controlling termites, comprising the step of applying to            
                soil where termites are alive or wood, a termite controlling effective amount of a            
                composition comprising (i) 3-(2,2-dihalovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylic             
                acid 3-phenoxybenzyl alcohol ester, the alcohol of which may have a cyano group               
                at α-position and (ii) N-(2-ethylhexyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-en-2,3-dicarboximide in a         
                weight ratio in the range of 1:1 to 1:20, as active ingredient and inert carrier.             









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007