Appeal No. 2001-1195
Application No. 09/154,485
Interferences, unless good cause is shown”) and § 1.192(c)(8)(iv) (the brief must point
out the errors in the rejection).
CONCLUSION
We have affirmed the rejection of claims 1-3 and 6-8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
We have reversed the rejection of claims 4, 5, 9 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The
examiner’s decision in rejecting claims 1-10 is thus affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MAHSHID D. SAADAT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-7-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007