Ex Parte BOUTAGHOU et al - Page 8




          Appeal No. 2001-1268                                                        
          Application No. 09/100,698                                                  


          attached to the surfaces depicted, with two near the leading edge           
          of the head/slider and two near the trailing edge of the                    
          head/slider, and the recesses 72 and 74, allowing for the first             
          and second heights described by appellants, wherein the ratio of            
          the difference between the first and second heights to the first            
          height is approximately 1:10.                                               
               While both Best and Okada disclose “stiction reduction means           
          for reducing stiction between the slider and the rotatable disc,”           
          with both references even showing four landing pads and                     
          recesses2, neither of these references discloses the exact                  
          structure of instant Figures 4-3, 5-1 and 5-2, having the landing           
          pads positioned exactly as shown, two at the leading edge and two           
          at the trailing edge of the head/slider, and having recesses, as            
          shown in the instant figures, such that the landing pads have               
          contact surfaces which extend to a first height below the air               
          bearing surface toward the disc surface, the landing pads extend            
          to a second height greater than the first height from the                   
          recessed surface farther from the disc surface than the air                 
          bearing surface and the ratio of the difference between the first           

               2The examiner indicates (Answer-page 7) that these recesses            
          are taught by Best in Figures 8A-9F and, by Okada, in Figures 1             
          and 4.  Appellants do not dispute this teaching of “recesses” by            
          the applied references.                                                     
                                         -8–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007