Ex Parte JONES et al - Page 3


                 Appeal No. 2001-1290                                                         Page 3                    
                 Application No. 08/950,032                                                                             

                 combination with the female hormone estrogen or synthetic estrogen analogues,                          
                 as effective modulators of both PR and ER.  On the other hand, antagonists to                          
                 PR are potentially useful in treating chronic disorders, such as certain hormone                       
                 dependent cancers of the breast, ovaries, and uterus, and in treating non-                             
                 malignant conditions such as uterine fibroids and endometriosis, a leading cause                       
                 of infertility in women.  Similarly, AR antagonists, such as cyproterone acetate                       
                 and flutamide have proved useful in the treatment of hyperplasia an dancer of the                      
                 prostate.” Specification, pages 1-2.                                                                   
                        The specification discloses that a number of quinoline derivatives are                          
                 agonists and/or antagonists for one or more of the PR, AR, ER, GR, and MR                              
                 steroid receptors.  See pages 35 to 249 (disclosing synthesis of exemplary                             
                 compounds), pages 23 to 33 (listing representative compounds that are agonists                         
                 or antagonists for various receptors), and pages 255 to 262 (showing results of in                     
                 vitro and in vivo assays to determine agonistic and antagonistic activity with                         
                 respect to various receptors).  The specification also discloses various conditions                    
                 or disorders that would be amenable to treatment with the disclosed compounds,                         
                 depending on their agonistic or antagonistic activity with respect to different                        
                 receptors.  See pages 22-23.                                                                           
                                                      Discussion                                                        
                        The claims are directed to therapeutic methods comprising administering                         
                 a quinoline derivative corresponding to one of three chemical formulae.  See                           
                 claim 16.  The examiner rejected the claims as nonenabled, based on a review of                        
                 the factors set out in In re Wands, 858 F.2d 731, 737, 8 USPQ2d 1400, 1404                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007