Ex Parte MEYERSON et al - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2001-1342                                                        
          Application 08/994,821                                                      


          source to image and decode the first dataform and to actuate the            
          imaging assembly and selectively energize the second illumination           
          source to image and decode the second dataform;                             
               f)  wherein the first illumination source illuminates the              
          target area with illumination having a spectral output centered             
          about a wavelength in the visible spectrum; and                             
               g) wherein the control and selection circuitry deenergizes             
          the second illumination source while the first illumination                 
          source is energized and deenergizes the first illumination source           
          while the second illumination source is energized.                          
                              References                                              
          Smith                         3,492,478           Jan. 27, 1970             
          Berson et al. (Berson)        5,502,304           Mar. 26, 1996             
          Barkan et al. (Barkan)        5,506,392           Apr.  9, 1996             
          Roustaei                      5,532,467           Jul.  2, 1996             
          Xu                            5,992,753           Nov. 30, 1999             
                              (filing date Oct. 30, 1997)                             
                              Rejection at Issue                                      
               Claims 1, 3, 6 through 8, 10 through 15, 17, 20 through 22,            
          and 24 through 28 stand rejected under U.S.C. § 103 as being                
          unpatentable over Xu in view of Berson and Barkan.  Claims 4, 5,            
          18 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                     
          unpatentable over Xu, Berson and Barkan, and further in view of             
          Roustaei.  Claims 9 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103             
          as being unpatentable over Xu, Berson and Barkan, and further in            
          view of Smith.                                                              




                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007