Appeal No. 2001-1380 Application No. 09/138,998 Akutagawa specifically states that “[b]y executing the above- mentioned operation reversely, the lid body 11 is turned to the closed state.” Accordingly, appellants argument in this regard is not persuasive. The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 3 and 4 under 35 U.S.C. 103 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) JERRY SMITH ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) MAHSHID D. SAADAT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) EK/RWK -7–Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007