Appeal No. 2001-1409 Page 8 Application No. 09/044,214 then dried and blocked to prevent nonspecific binding. See, e.g., column 6, lines 41-51. The prepared substrate and the test sample are then added together to a test tube containing the labeling reagent. See column 7, lines 3-9. After incubation for fifteen minutes, the signal is read. Column 7, lines 10-15. The examiner has not adequately explained how Todd’s method of adding both substrate and sample to a labeling solution would have suggested the claimed step of spotting a treated saliva sample onto an immunoassay substrate. Summary The examiner has not shown that the claims, considered as a whole, would have made obvious in view of Todd and Archetti. The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are reversed. REVERSED Sherman D. Winters ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Eric Grimes ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007