The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte JOHN HAROLD MAGERLEIN and ALBERT E. RUEHLI _____________ Appeal No. 2001-1444 Application No. 08/994,706 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 18-23. Claims 1-17 were canceled earlier in the prosecution. An amendment filed January 25, 2001 after final rejection, which canceled claim 21, was approved for entry by the Examiner. Accordingly, only the Examiner’s rejection of claims 18-20, 22, and 23 is before us on appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007