Ex Parte BIRDSLEY et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1451                                                        
          Application No. 09/166,656                                                  


               1.   An integrated circuit structure in a device package,              
          comprising:                                                                 
               a package substrate including a first set of bonding pads on           
          a first surface and a second set of bonding pads on a second                
          surface;                                                                    
               a device substrate having an exposed back surface, a front             
          surface, and a circuit interconnect layer disposed near the front           
          surface and having a plurality of electronic components formed              
          therein and a plurality of input/output pads connected to                   
          selected ones of the components and to respective ones of the               
          second set of bonding pads of the package substrate;                        
               an active region disposed in the device substrate between              
          the interconnect layer and the back surface; and                            
               an electrically conductive probe extending from the back               
          surface of the device substrate to the active region and                    
          terminating at the active region, the probe including a signal-             
          coupling tip adapted to electrically couple to the active region.           
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Filippazzi et al. (Filippazzi)     3,787,252      Jan. 22, 1974             
          Chatterjee                         4,889,832      Dec. 26, 1989             
          Kazama                             5,291,129      Mar. 01, 1994             
          Gaul et al. (Gaul)                 5,807,783      Sep. 15, 1998             
                                        (filed Oct. 07, 1996)                         
          Appellants' admitted prior art at pages 1-5 of the specification            
          and Figure 1 (AAPA)                                                         
               Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being           
          unpatentable over Filippazzi in view of AAPA.                               
               Claims 3 through 17 and 19 through 23 stand rejected under             
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Filippazzi in view of            
          AAPA and Chatterjee.                                                        
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007