Ex Parte AZUA et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2001-1507                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/972,129                                                                                  


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     Appellants’ invention relates to a data processing system and method for storing                     
              data in a communication network.  The system retrieves an application from a network,                       
              computes a signature using the application and compares the computed signature to a                         
              prior stored signature to determine if the program is to be compiled.  An understanding                     
              of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is                               
              reproduced below.1                                                                                          
              1.     A method for operating a communication network having a user data processor,                         
                     comprising the steps of:                                                                             
                     retrieving an application;                                                                           
                     computing a first signature using the application;                                                   
                     comparing the first signature with a second signature previously                                     
                            stored in a first memory of the data processor; and                                           
                     selectively compiling the selected portion of the application to                                     
                            generate interpreted code when the first signature does not                                   
                            correspond to the second signature.                                                           
                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                      
              appealed claims are:                                                                                        
              Zhang, X. Nick, “Secure Code Distribution,” COMPUTER, pp. 76-79 (June 1997).                                



                     1  We note that independent claim 1 and independent claims 7 and 18 contain the phrase “the          
              selected portion of the application,” but we find no express antecedent basis for this limitation.  We leave it
              to the examiner to correct this minor deficiency.                                                           
                                                           2                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007