Appeal No. 2001-1517
Application No. 09/132,285
scheduled medical appointments. (See brief at pages 7-8.) We agree with appellant
and find that the examiner has not provided any convincing line of reasoning beyond
mere conclusion and supposition based upon improper hindsight. Therefore, we cannot
sustain the examiner’s rejection of independent claim 4 and its dependent claims.
Similarly, we cannot sustain the rejection of independent claims 19, 28 and their
dependent claims.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 4-12 and 19-34
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007