Appeal No. 2001-1578
Application No. 08/771,550
References
The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:
Magee et al. 5,729,710 Mar. 17, 1998
(Magee '710) (filed Jun. 22, 1994)
Magee et al. 5,771,383 Jun. 23, 1998
(Magee '383) (effectively filed Dec. 27, 1994)
Alderson 5,347,649 Sep. 13, 1994
J. Chase, et al. "Sharing and Protection in a Single-Address-
Space Operating System," ACM Transactions on Computer Systems,
Vol. 12, No. 4, (11-1994), pp. 271-301.
Rejections at Issue
Claims 1-4, 9-13, 16-18, 23, 24, 27 and 28 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Magee '383 and
Magee '710 in view of Chase.
Claims 5-8, 14, 15, 19-22, 25, 26 and 29-31 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Magee '383 and
Magee '710 in view of Chase and further in view of Alderson.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the
Examiner, we make reference to the brief and answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
With full consideration being given to the subject matter on
appeal, the Examiner's rejections and the arguments of Appellants
55
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007