Appeal No. 2001-1624
Application 09/164,583
line 26, to page 24, line 2). However, "[w]hen the revise key
F505 is operated, the copy modes of a registered job are revised
but registration of a new job does not take place ." (Emphasis
added.) (Spec. at 24, lines 5-7.) To take a word processing
example, if a user retrieves an existing document, revises it,
and saves it under the same name, this becomes a "revised
document," whereas if the user retrieves an existing document and
saves it under a new name, with or without revision, this becomes
a "new document" using the common meaning of words. The examiner
has not said how else appellant could claim the invention if
there is no difference between a "revised job" and a "new job."
Because Gauronski does not disclose saving (registering) the
revised job as a "new job," it fails to anticipate the claims on
appeal. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1-18 is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
- 6 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007