Ex Parte HORTALEZA - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1690                                                        
          Application 08/859,407                                                      



                    Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on                
          appeal and is reproduced below:                                             
                    1.  A method of fabricating a micromechanical device,             
          comprising the steps of:                                                    
          a) processing a wafer to form a plurality of partially fabricated           
          devices, the devices having a micromechanical structure defined             
          upon a first layer;                                                         
          b) subdividing the wafer to separate the partially fabricated               
          devices;                                                                    
          c) mounting the separated partially fabricated devices on a                 
          package with the first layer still in place;                                
          d) undercutting the first layer from the mounted partially                  
          fabricated devices to free the micromechanical structure for                
          movement; and                                                               
          e) attaching a lid to the package.                                          

                    The references relied upon by the examiner are:                   
          Glenn                        4,855,544           Aug.  8, 1989              
          Mignardi                     5,389,182           Feb. 14, 1995              
          Trah et al. (Trah)           5,595,940           Jan. 21, 1997              

                                GROUNDS OF REJECTION                                  
                    1.  Claims 1, 2, 3 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.           
          § 102(b) as anticipated by Mignardi.                                        
                    2.  Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as              
          unpatentable over Mignardi in view of Trah.                                 


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007