The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 38 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SOURAV K. KUNDU and TED S. GEISELMAN ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1715 Application No. 08/730,892 ____________ HEARD: May 08, 2003 ____________ Before WALTZ, TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 1-3, 5-11 and 19-24, all of the pending claims.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. 1 In rendering our decision, we have considered Appellants’ arguments presented in the Brief, filed May 3, 2000 and the Reply Brief, filed September 14, 2000.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007