Appeal No. 2001-1773 Application No. 08/732,864 Page 2 BACKGROUND Appellants' invention relates to a method and apparatus for drop weight encoding. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows: 1. An inkjet print cartridge for use in an inkjet printing apparatus for forming images on print media, the inkjet print cartridge comprising: a pen body; an inkjet printhead mounted to the pen body for ejecting ink drops onto print media, the inkjet printhead having a manufacturing tolerance associated therewith and producing a corresponding actual drop weight for said printhead which is dependent on the manufacturing tolerance in a range of drop weights; and an information storage device supported by the pen body and associated with the inkjet printhead for storing information for identifying said corresponding actual drop weight for said printhead, said information readable by the inkjet printing apparatus. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Watrobski et al. 5,504,507 Apr. 2, 1996 (Watrobski) (effectively filed Oct. 8, 1992) Bullock et al. 5,699,091 Dec. 16, 1997 (Bullock) (filed Jan. 8, 1996) Claims 1-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Bullock in view of Watrobski.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007