Ex Parte RAMAN et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1773                                                        
          Application No. 08/732,864                                 Page 2           


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants' invention relates to a method and apparatus for            
          drop weight encoding.  An understanding of the invention can be             
          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced            
          as follows:                                                                 
               1. An inkjet print cartridge for use in an inkjet printing             
          apparatus for forming images on print media, the inkjet print               
          cartridge comprising:                                                       
               a pen body;                                                            
               an inkjet printhead mounted to the pen body for ejecting ink           
          drops onto print media, the inkjet printhead having a                       
          manufacturing tolerance associated therewith and producing a                
          corresponding actual drop weight for said printhead which is                
          dependent on the manufacturing tolerance in a range of drop                 
          weights; and                                                                
               an information storage device supported by the pen body and            
          associated with the inkjet printhead for storing information for            
          identifying said corresponding actual drop weight for said                  
          printhead, said information readable by the inkjet printing                 
          apparatus.                                                                  
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Watrobski et al.           5,504,507              Apr.  2, 1996             
          (Watrobski)                   (effectively filed Oct.  8, 1992)             
          Bullock et al.             5,699,091              Dec. 16, 1997             
          (Bullock)                          (filed Jan.  8, 1996)                    
               Claims 1-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being              
          unpatentable over Bullock in view of Watrobski.                             











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007