Ex Parte ROSENBERG et al - Page 9




               Appeal No. 2001-1860                                                                                                  
               Application No. 08/993,104                                                                                            

                                                         CONCLUSION                                                                  
                       We have sustained the rejection of claims 1-14 and 16-25 under 35 U.S.C.                                      
               § 112, second paragraph, and the rejection of claims 1-14 and 17-25 under 35 U.S.C.                                   
               § 103.  The examiner’s rejection of claims 1-14 and 16-25 is thus affirmed.                                           
                       We have considered all of appellants’ arguments in making our determinations.                                 
               Arguments not relied upon are deemed waived.  See 37 CFR § 1.192(a) (“Any                                             
               arguments or authorities not included in the brief will be refused consideration by the                               
               Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, unless good cause is shown.”) and                                          
               §§ 1.192(c)(8)(ii),(iv) (the brief must point out the errors in the rejection).                                       





















                                                                -9-                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007