Ex Parte BREKELMANS et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2001-1871                                                                                     
              Application No. 09/082,449                                                                               

                                                   BACKGROUND                                                          
                     The invention relates to calibration of an oscillator which is part of a phase                    
              locked loop (PLL).   Claim 7 is reproduced below.                                                        
                     7.    A method of calibrating an oscillator, which forms a part of a phase-locked                 
                     loop for synchronizing the phase-locked loop’s oscillator with a carrier (CA), the                
                     method comprising the steps of:                                                                   
                           measuring a frequency difference (dF) between a nominal frequency                           
                     (Fnom) of the carrier (CA) and a frequency (Fosc) of the phase-locked loop’s                      
                     oscillator; and                                                                                   
                           adjusting the frequency (Fosc) of the phase-locked loop’s oscillator in                     
                     accordance with the measured frequency difference (dF).                                           
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                  
              Mogi                              4,305,157                          Dec.  8, 1981                       
              Toda et al. (Toda)                5,388,125                          Feb.  7, 1995                       
                     Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Toda.                       
                     Claims 1-3, 5, and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                
              unpatentable over Toda and Mogi.                                                                         
                     Claim 4 is objected to as depending from a rejected claim, but deemed allowable                   
              if rewritten in independent form.                                                                        
                     Claims 8-10 have been withdrawn from consideration.                                               
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 6) and the Examiner’s Answer (Paper                    
              No. 11) for a statement of the examiner’s position and to the Brief (Paper No. 10) and                   
              the Reply Brief (Paper No. 12) for appellants’ position with respect to the claims which                 
              stand rejected.                                                                                          
                                                          -2-                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007