The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 33 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte MOHAN L. SANDUJA, CARL HOROWITZ, ELLA MAYSLICH, and PAUL THOTTATHIL _____________ Appeal No. 2001-1879 Application No. 08/919,448 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before KIMLIN, PAK and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 8, 10-13, 15 and 16. Claims 1-7, 9 and 14, the other claims remaining in the present application, stand withdrawn from consideration pursuant to a restriction requirement. Claim 8 is illustrative: 8. A coated steel workpiece coated by a process which comprises the steps of:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007