Ex Parte OHMAN et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                            Paper No. 47              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                        Ex parte PETER OHMAN and ROLF LASSON                          
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2001-1884                                  
                             Application No. 08/718,692                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                HEARD: MAY 20, 2003                                   
                                   _______________                                    
          Before PAK, DELMENDO, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent           
          Judges.                                                                     
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from             
          the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 39 through 41, 49 through            
          60, 66 through 71 and 73 through 75.  Claims 42 through 47 and              
          61 through 65, the remaining claims in the above-identified                 
          application, have been indicated to be allowable “if rewritten in           
          independent form including all of the limitations of the base               
          claim and any intervening claims.”  See the final Office action             
          dated May 30, 2000 (Paper No. 32), page 5.                                  




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007